> > > > Why not use an ordinary qemu_irq? It reresents a pin; 0->1 edge > > (assert) enters phase 1, 1->0 edge (deassert) enters phase 2. > > Exactly like real hardware. > > QEMU makes no difference between power-on reset and system reset > right > now. At least I am not aware of any device model that has problems > with > this. Thus there is apparently no need to treat reset and create > differently. As QOM requires a two-phase device creation anyway (to > let > properties to "settle"), it looks like there is some reuse potential. >
I'm all for sharing this. But let's model it as a qemu_irq or Pin. btw, we could have qemu_irqs that take an extra qemu_irq reset input, so we can do this without much coding.
