On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:06:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/23/21 15:01, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 04/23/21 12:31, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > >>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:16:24AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >>>> On 4/22/21 4:13 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >>>>> On 04/21/21 13:51, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > >> > >>>>> Should we file a libvirtd Feature Request (where?) for recognizing the > >>>>> @amd-sev-es feature flag? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, we should. We can use RedHat bugzilla for that. Laszlo - do you > >>>> want to > >>>> do it yourself or shall I help you with that? > >>> > >>> This BZ looks like it's already tracking support for amd-sev-es [1]. > >>> > >>> Pavel. > >>> > >>> [1] <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895035> > >> > >> That's a private RHBZ that tracks SEV-ES for a product that is different > >> from "libvirt upstream". > > > > I didn't notice that's a private RHBZ, thanks for pointing it out. > > > > For upstream libvirt we no longer use RHBZ to track RFEs/BZs, we use > > gitlab issues so if we want to track the work in upstream as well I can > > create a new issue. > > Heh, I suspected I was missing something there :) Yes, please, if you or > Michal could create a new issue in gitlab, that would be great.
I've created a new libvirt issue [1], hopefully the description makes sense. :) Pavel [1] <https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/156>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature