Le 16/03/2021 à 12:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit : > On 3/16/21 10:01 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> Le 15/03/2021 à 13:33, BALATON Zoltan a écrit : >>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I've started posting this series well in advance to get it into 6.0 and >>>> yet it seems like it may >>>> be missing it due to organisational issues (no real complaints were found >>>> with patches but >>>> Philippe seems to like more review that does not seem to happen as nobody >>>> is interested). Looks >>>> like David is waiting for an ack from Philippe but will be away next week >>>> so if this is not >>>> resolved now it may be too late on Monday. To avoid that: >>>> >>>> David, could you please send an ack before you leave for the last two >>>> patches so it could get >>>> committed via some other tree while you're away? >>>> >>>> Philippe, if you can't ack the vt82c686 patches now are you OK with taking >>>> the whole series via >>>> your tree before the freeze? That would give you some more days to review >>>> and it could always be >>>> reverted during the freeze but if it's not merged now I'll have to wait >>>> until the summer to get it >>>> in again which would be another long delay. I don't think this will get >>>> more reviews unless it's >>>> in master and people can start using and testing it better. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Since David seems to be away for this week before seeing my mail asking for >>> an ack from him, now >>> this can only get in by Philippe or Peter. (David said before he'd be OK >>> with the series if Philippe >>> acked it so I think that can count as an implicit ack and it could always >>> be reverted before the >>> releease.) >>> >>> Philippe, do you have anything against this to get merged now? If not >>> please send a pull or ack it >>> so it has a chance to be in 6.0 or tell if you still intend to do anything >>> about it before the >>> freeze. This series was on the list since January and the remaining parts >>> you did not take are here >>> since February 22nd and the version after your first review since two weeks >>> so it would be nice to >>> sort this out and not block it any further without a good reason. >> >> Pegasos looks like a New World PowerMac, so perhaps Mark can help? > > The PPC part is mostly reviewed. The problem is the first patch: > "vt82c686: Implement control of serial port io ranges via config regs".
vt82c686.c is a Fuloong 2E file, why Fuloong 2E maintainers are not involved in the review? Thanks, Laurent
