> + offset = colo_bitmap_find_dirty(ram_state, block, offset, > + &num); IIUC, this return value would pass to the next round as start index, so you should skip the already checked one.
Thanks On 3/12/21 5:56 PM, Rao, Lei wrote: > How about redefine a function named packet_new_nocopy? > In comments, we can tell the caller don't release the buffer and the > packet_destroy will release it. > > Thanks, > Lei. > -----Original Message----- > From:lizhij...@fujitsu.com <lizhij...@fujitsu.com> > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 2:53 PM > To: Rao, Lei<lei....@intel.com>; Zhang, > Chen<chen.zh...@intel.com>;jasow...@redhat.com;quint...@redhat.com;dgilb...@redhat.com;pbonz...@redhat.com;lukasstra...@web.de > Cc:qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] Optimize the function of packet_new > >
