On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:50:26PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> writes: > > > 28.01.2021 18:28, John Snow wrote: > >> On 1/28/21 10:09 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> I'm developing Qemu backup for several years, and finally new backup > >>>> architecture, including block-copy generic engine and backup-top filter > >>>> landed upstream, great thanks to reviewers and especially to > >>>> Max Reitz! > <snip> > >> Great! > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Could someone pull it? > > > > I don't have any signed PGP key for now, to send pull requests :\ > > Interesting, could I get one while sitting in Moscow? > > Hmm this does point somewhat to a hole in our maintainer process that has > previously relied on semi-regular physical meet-up for key signing > purposes. It might be some time before we return to a new normal. Are > there any other maintainers in Moscow that you could safely meet for a > socially distanced key-signing?
AFAIK, we've never actually set expectations for what process a key signing must use. Merely that key should be signed by one or more people who are already QEMU maintainers. It is more or less up to the person signing the key what hoops they want to jump through before adding their signature. So while physically meeting is a traditional standard, some might be fine to do key signing verification over a video conference system, especially if both sides already know each other by sight after previous physical meetings. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
