On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 05:28, Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jime...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 1/19/2021 4:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Test cases aren't very exciting, but was it really intentional > > to change the default behaviour? > My intention was to preserve the default behavior. Perhaps Paolo wanted > to reduce the number of GUEST_PANICKED events by removing the one with > 'pause' action? You could consider it superfluous since it is > immediately followed by another indicating the 'poweroff' action... > Unless I hear otherwise from either of you, I'll work on a fix to keep > the same number and type of events sent.
I'm happy to defer to you/Paolo on the behaviour -- I mostly wanted to check if the change was intentional. -- PMM
