On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:46:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/04/2011 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:37:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 09/04/2011 06:24 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Of course it doesn't ignore it. See the 440fx implementation, if > >> >> you disable VGA access (via the SMRAM register), vga goes away. > >> > > >> >Yes but that's for VGA RAM, right? I'm talking about the IO addresses: > >> >are tons of aliases created as you suggest? > >> > >> No. > > > >So a full 16 bit decode is done for now? > > > > Correct.
Then we probably can ignore the issue and do 16 bit decode all over for now. > But isn't it needed? Otherwise why don't vga accesses > alias with a virtio device at 0xc3c0? It really depends on the device I think. > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
