John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes: > On 12/18/20 12:24 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> I could conceivably use source line information and stuff, to be >>> needlessly fancy about it. Nah. I just think singleton patterns are kind >>> of weird to implement in Python, so I didn't. >> Stupidest singleton that could possibly work: in __init__, >> self.singleton = ... >> > > Yeah, you can make a class variable that has a builtin singleton, then > make the class method return that class variable. > > Feels fancier than my laziness permits. I just put it back to using > one copy per definition.
Why have a class method around the attribute? Just use the stoopid attribute already ;-P
