On 26/10/2020 17.15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 26/10/20 16:33, Joelle van Dyne wrote: >> Just to be clear, you're in favor of removing the >> --enable-cross-compile option? I can do that if others agree but I'm >> not sure what the downside of adding this extra option is? > > For me the downside is that it's not clear that --cross-prefix=foo- > implies --enable-cross-compile.
I agree with Paolo ... two options sound rather confusing to me than just having one option. And the amount of options of the configure script is too big already anyway, so I'd recommend to drop --enable-cross-compile. Thomas