On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:12:58 +0530 Kirti Wankhede <kwankh...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/2020 1:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > I'm a bit worried though that all that reasoning which flags are set or > > cleared when is quite complex, and it's easy to make mistakes. > > > > Can we model this as a FSM, where an event (running state changes) > > transitions the device state from one state to another? I (personally) > > find FSMs easier to comprehend, but I'm not sure whether that change > > would be too invasive. If others can parse the state changes with that > > mask/value interface, I won't object to it. > > > > I agree FSM will be easy and for long term may be easy to maintain. But > at this moment it will be intrusive change. For now we can go ahead with > this code and later we can change to FSM model, if all agrees on it. Yes, we can certainly revisit this later.
