On 10/14/20 3:21 AM, Jiangyifei wrote: >> Would this be a good time to expand mstatus to uint64_t instead of >> target_ulong so that it can be saved as one unit and reduce some ifdefs in >> the >> code base? >> >> Similarly with some of the other status registers that are two halved for >> riscv32. > > I agree with you that it should be rearranged. > But I hope this series will focus on achieving migration. > Can I send another patch to rearrange it later?
Well, that changes the bit layout for migration. While we could bump the version number, it seemed easier to change the representation first. r~
