On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 06:27:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/10/20 17:58, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> >>
> >
> > cd442a45db60a1a72fcf980c24bd1227f13f8a87 is the first bad commit
> >
> > Sorry for noticing this earlier, but is this known? The build starts
> > failing for me after this commit:
> >
> > /usr/bin/sphinx-build -Dversion=5.1.50 -Drelease= -W
> > -Ddepfile=docs/devel.d -Ddepfile_stamp=docs/devel.stamp -b html -d
> > /home/zippy/work/qemu/qemu.git/build/docs/devel.p
> > /home/zippy/work/qemu/qemu.git/docs/devel
> > /home/zippy/work/qemu/qemu.git/build/docs/devel
> > Running Sphinx v3.2.1
> > building [mo]: targets for 0 po files that are out of date
> > building [html]: targets for 20 source files that are out of date
> > updating environment: [new config] 20 added, 0 changed, 0 removed
> > reading sources... [100%] testing
>
> No, this is new. It works with older versions of Sphinx (I have 2.2.2
> despite being on Fedora 32 which is pretty recent).
>
> For now Sphinx 3 is not supported by kerneldoc, we probably should apply
> a patch like
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg83277.html
We already have Sphinx 3.x hacks inside our fork of kernel-doc,
see commit 152d1967f650 ("kernel-doc: Use c:struct for Sphinx 3.0
and later").
If we want to keep deviating from upstream kernel-doc, the
following patch seems to work. Do we want to?
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index 40ad782e342..03b49380426 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -838,6 +838,13 @@ sub output_function_rst(%) {
$lineprefix = "";
output_highlight_rst($args{'purpose'});
$start = "\n\n**Syntax**\n\n ``";
+ } elsif ($args{'functiontype'} eq "") {
+ # this is a macro, Sphinx 3.x requires c:macro::
+ if ((split(/\./, $sphinx_version))[0] >= 3) {
+ print ".. c:macro:: ";
+ } else {
+ print ".. c:function:: ";
+ }
} else {
print ".. c:function:: ";
}
>
> Paolo
>
--
Eduardo
