On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:19:46PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 9/3/20 12:42 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > This will make the type name constant consistent with the name of > > > the type checking macro. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > > --- > > > hw/intc/i8259.c | 10 +++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c > > > index 344fd04db1..e536cc90be 100644 > > > --- a/hw/intc/i8259.c > > > +++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c > > > @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ > > > > > > //#define DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY > > > > > > -#define TYPE_I8259 "isa-i8259" > > > +#define TYPE_PIC "isa-i8259" > > > > I disagree with this patch, as we have various PIC and only one I8259. > > Like in the I8254 case, I agree with your point. I will suggest > renaming the PIC macro to I8259 instead.
I'd suggest it should be TYPE_ISA_I8259 to match the object type name string. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|