On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 23:53, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/20 2:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The other approach would be to standardize on "the decodetree pattern
> > always converts the size to the data-type size, regardless of how
> > it's encoded in the insn fields", and then you could check against
> > MO_16 here. Would that be better ?
>
> That might be clearer, yes.  Otherwise it's hard to tell what "size" means
> without looking at the manual for each instance.

Do you mind if I do that as a separate patchset after this one?
I feel that will be easier than trying to weave the change into
this series...

-- PMM

Reply via email to