On 8/28/20 2:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > The other approach would be to standardize on "the decodetree pattern > always converts the size to the data-type size, regardless of how > it's encoded in the insn fields", and then you could check against > MO_16 here. Would that be better ?
That might be clearer, yes. Otherwise it's hard to tell what "size" means without looking at the manual for each instance. r~
