On 8/12/20 4:49 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > On 8/11/20 11:03 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de> >> --- >> accel/stubs/Makefile.objs | 1 - >> accel/stubs/hvf-stub.c | 30 ------------------------------ >> include/sysemu/hvf.h | 8 -------- >> target/i386/hvf/hvf-cpus.c | 1 + >> target/i386/hvf/hvf-int.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> target/i386/hvf/hvf.c | 1 + >> target/i386/hvf/x86hvf.c | 2 ++ >> target/i386/hvf/x86hvf.h | 1 - >> 8 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 accel/stubs/hvf-stub.c >> create mode 100644 target/i386/hvf/hvf-int.h [...] >> --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf-cpus.c >> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf-cpus.c >> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ >> #include "target/i386/cpu.h" >> #include "qemu/guest-random.h" >> >> +#include "hvf-int.h" >> #include "hvf-cpus.h" >> >> /* >> diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf-int.h b/target/i386/hvf/hvf-int.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000000..50d108ca08 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf-int.h > > > Hmm maybe I could avoid creating a new header file, > and just cram these functions in hvf-cpus.h ?
Yes it seems better (similar rename with the other accelerators). > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Claudio
