On 2020/6/30 15:20, Chih-Min Chao wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 5:05 AM LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@c-sky.com
<mailto:zhiwei_...@c-sky.com>> wrote:
A narrow n-bit operation, where n < FLEN, checks that input operands
are correctly NaN-boxed, i.e., all upper FLEN - n bits are 1.
If so, the n least-significant bits of the input are used as the
input value,
otherwise the input value is treated as an n-bit canonical NaN.
Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@c-sky.com
<mailto:zhiwei_...@c-sky.com>>
---
target/riscv/translate.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index 4b1534c9a6..1c9b809d4a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -104,6 +104,35 @@ static void gen_nanbox_fpr(DisasContext *ctx,
int regno)
}
}
+/*
+ * A narrow n-bit operation, where n < FLEN, checks that input
operands
+ * are correctly NaN-boxed, i.e., all upper FLEN - n bits are 1.
+ * If so, the n least-signicant bits of the input are used as the
input value,
+ * otherwise the input value is treated as an n-bit canonical NaN.
+ * (riscv-spec-v2.2 Section 9.2).
+ */
+static void check_nanboxed(DisasContext *ctx, int num, ...)
+{
+ if (has_ext(ctx, RVD)) {
+ int i;
+ TCGv_i64 cond1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
forget to remove ?
Oops! Once I wanted to use tcg_gen_setcond_i64.
Thanks for pointing it out. I will fixed it next patch set.
Zhiwei
+ TCGv_i64 t_nan = tcg_const_i64(0x7fc00000);
+ TCGv_i64 t_max = tcg_const_i64(MAKE_64BIT_MASK(32, 32));
+ va_list valist;
+ va_start(valist, num);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ TCGv_i64 t = va_arg(valist, TCGv_i64);
+ tcg_gen_movcond_i64(TCG_COND_GEU, t, t, t_max, t, t_nan);
+ }
+
+ va_end(valist);
+ tcg_temp_free_i64(cond1);
forget to remove ?
+ tcg_temp_free_i64(t_nan);
+ tcg_temp_free_i64(t_max);
+ }
+}
+
static void generate_exception(DisasContext *ctx, int excp)
{
tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_pc, ctx->base.pc_next);
--
2.23.0
Chih-Min Chao
