On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:15 PM Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:43 PM Christian Ehrhardt <
> christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:46 AM Marc-André Lureau <
>> marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since commit 781f2b3d1e ("qga: process_event() simplification"),
>>> send_response() is called unconditionally, but will assert when "rsp" is
>>> NULL. This may happen with QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP commands, such as
>>> "guest-shutdown".
>>>
>>> Fixes: 781f2b3d1e5ef389b44016a897fd55e7a780bf35
>>> Cc: Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Reported-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> qga/main.c | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qga/main.c b/qga/main.c
>>> index f0e454f28d3..3febf3b0fdf 100644
>>> --- a/qga/main.c
>>> +++ b/qga/main.c
>>> @@ -531,7 +531,11 @@ static int send_response(GAState *s, const QDict
>>> *rsp)
>>> QString *payload_qstr, *response_qstr;
>>> GIOStatus status;
>>>
>>> - g_assert(rsp && s->channel);
>>> + g_assert(s->channel);
>>> +
>>> + if (!rsp) {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks Marc-André,
>> LGTM and should fix the issues I was seeing.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>
>>
>
> In the meantime I also got to test this against the initially reported
> issue, LGTM as well (ran as no-change backport onto 4.2).
>
> Tested-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>
>
This LGTM with 2*reviews 1*tested and 11 days on the list without any
negative feedback.
I just wanted to re-check if there is anything else left for this to be
committed?
