On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hello, > > Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code > (machines) [1] and the effort done to gather the information shared in > the replies [2], and the various acceptance tests added, is it > feasible to require for the next release that each new device/machine > is provided a test covering it? > > If no, what is missing?
If a qtest is feasible, yes, I think we should require one for new devices. But what about machines - you normally need a test image for this. In that case, there is still the question where testing images could be hosted. Not every developer has a web space where they could put their test images onto. And what about images that contain non-free code? Thomas
