On Wed 06 May 2020 07:39:48 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote: > In fact, if we rely on 20/31 checking for invalid subclusters when > computing nb_clusters, we could probably assert that the start and end > cluster in this function are not invalid, instead of adding the fail: > label.
I think you're right with that, good catch! There's no need to return an error code in this function. Berto
