On 5/6/20 4:25 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
vhdx doesn't have .bdrv_co_block_status handler, so DATA|ALLOCATED is
always assumed for it. unallocated_blocks_are_zero is useless, drop it.
After the analysis I did in patch 1, this is correct. No behavior change.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
---
block/vhdx.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c
index aedd782604..45963a3166 100644
--- a/block/vhdx.c
+++ b/block/vhdx.c
@@ -1164,9 +1164,6 @@ static int vhdx_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs,
BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
bdi->cluster_size = s->block_size;
- bdi->unallocated_blocks_are_zero =
- (s->params.data_bits & VHDX_PARAMS_HAS_PARENT) == 0;
-
return 0;
}
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
