Hi Ramon,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramon Fried <rfried....@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 9:20 PM
> To: Sai Pavan Boddu <saip...@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com>; Alistair Francis
> <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>; Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>;
> Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>; Markus Armbruster
> <arm...@redhat.com>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>;
> Tong Ho <to...@xilinx.com>; open list:Xilinx Zynq <qemu-
> a...@nongnu.org>; QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cadence GEM Fixes
> 
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:14 PM Sai Pavan Boddu
> <sai.pavan.bo...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following patch series fixes issues with priority queues, Adds JUMBO
> > Frame support, Makes Debug statements compilable & Fixes related to
> > multicast frames.
> >
> > Changes for V2:
> >         Fixed build failure on fedora docker machine
> >         Fix buggy debug print to use sized integer casting
> >
> > Sai Pavan Boddu (9):
> >   net: cadence_gem: Fix debug statements
> >   net: cadence_gem: Fix the queue address update during wrap around
> >   net: cadence_gem: Fix irq update w.r.t queue
> >   net: cadence_gem: Define access permission for interrupt registers
> >   net: cadence_gem: Set ISR according to queue in use
> >   net: cadence_gem: Add support for jumbo frames
> >   net: cadnece_gem: Update irq_read_clear field of designcfg_debug1 reg
> >   net: cadence_gem: Update the reset value for interrupt mask register
> >   net: cadence_gem: TX_LAST bit should be set by guest
> >
> > Tong Ho (1):
> >   net: cadence_gem: Fix RX address filtering
> >
> >  hw/net/cadence_gem.c | 167
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> Hey. did you test these with 64 descriptor addressing ?
[Sai Pavan Boddu] Tested it with a BareMetal application.

> I can test it for you if you need.
[Sai Pavan Boddu] Yes, would be nice, if you can review.

Thanks,
Sai Pavan
> Thanks,
> Ramon.

Reply via email to