Hello Bharata, thank you for reviewing and testing! During review of this new flag, it was suggested to change it's name to a better one (on platform's viewpoint).
So I will have to change the flag name from SPAPR_LMB_FLAGS_HOTPLUGGED to SPAPR_LMB_FLAGS_HOTREMOVABLE. Everything should work the same as today. Best regards, Leonardo On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 14:46 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM David Gibson > <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:22:02PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > > On reboot, all memory that was previously added using object_add and > > > device_add is placed in this DIMM area. > > > > > > The new SPAPR_LMB_FLAGS_HOTPLUGGED flag helps Linux to put this memory in > > > the correct memory zone, so no unmovable allocations are made there, > > > allowing the object to be easily hot-removed by device_del and > > > object_del. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leona...@linux.ibm.com> > > > > > > --- > > > The new flag was already proposed on Power Architecture documentation, > > > and it's waiting for approval. > > > > > > I would like to get your comments on this change, but it's still not > > > ready for being merged. > > > > This looks reasonable to me - at the very least it doesn't look like > > it could do much harm. > > Looks good to me, also tested with PowerKVM guests. > > Reviewed-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.ibm.com> > > Regards, > Bharata.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part