On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:21:17PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Sometimes it would be good to be able to read the pin number along > > with the IRQ number allocated. Since we'll dump the IRQ number, no > > reason to not dump the pin information. For example, the vfio-pci > > device will overwrite the pin with the hardware pin number. It would > > be nice to know the pin number of one assigned device from QMP/HMP. > > > > CC: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > CC: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> > > CC: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > CC: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com> > > CC: Julia Suvorova <jus...@redhat.com> > > CC: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > --- > > > > This helped me to debug an IRQ sharing issue, so may good to have it > > in master too. > > --- > > hw/pci/pci.c | 1 + > > monitor/hmp-cmds.c | 3 ++- > > qapi/misc.json | 6 ++++-- > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c > > index e1ed6677e1..7ebf532ac9 100644 > > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c > > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c > > @@ -1769,6 +1769,7 @@ static PciDeviceInfo *qmp_query_pci_device(PCIDevice > > *dev, PCIBus *bus, > > info->regions = qmp_query_pci_regions(dev); > > info->qdev_id = g_strdup(dev->qdev.id ? dev->qdev.id : ""); > > > > + info->irq_pin = dev->config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN]; > > if (dev->config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] != 0) { > > info->has_irq = true; > > info->irq = dev->config[PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE]; > > diff --git a/monitor/hmp-cmds.c b/monitor/hmp-cmds.c > > index 58724031ea..04c86bbb03 100644 > > --- a/monitor/hmp-cmds.c > > +++ b/monitor/hmp-cmds.c > > @@ -680,7 +680,8 @@ static void hmp_info_pci_device(Monitor *mon, const > > PciDeviceInfo *dev) > > } > > > > if (dev->has_irq) { > > - monitor_printf(mon, " IRQ %" PRId64 ".\n", dev->irq); > > + monitor_printf(mon, " IRQ %" PRId64 ", pin %c\n", > > + dev->irq, (char)('A' + dev->irq_pin - 1)); > > Can we trust dev->irq_pin not to be something silly and generate a > non-printable?
It should be strictly a value between 1-4 corresponds to irq pin A-D (note the has_irq check masked out the zero value, or it could be 0-4), so I think it should always make sense. Otherwise I see it a qemu bug somewhere... Thanks, -- Peter Xu