Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com> writes: > I think, more concretely, the issues here are: > > * The only mention of "semihosting" in the RISC-V specification is in the > commentary, which is not considered a normative part of the > specification.
Ok, we're starting the process of creating a 'real' RISC-V semihosting spec. This references the existing 2.0 version of the ARM semihosting specification, defining only the RISC-V specific details necessary. I've created a public github repository containing this work; that is likely to eventually move over to the RISC-V github repository. https://github.com/keith-packard/riscv-semihosting-spec/ The goal is to enable RISC-V semihosting implementations that share most of the underlying details with existing ARM semihosting implemenations. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature