On 27/01/2020 17.09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 1/27/20 5:02 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 21/01/2020 00.51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> This test runs U-Boot on the Raspberry Pi 2. >>> It is very simple and fast: >>> >>> $ avocado --show=app,console run -t raspi2 -t u-boot >>> tests/acceptance/ >>> JOB LOG : avocado/job-results/job-2020-01-20T23.40-2424777/job.log >>> (1/1) >>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_raspi2_uboot: >>> >>> console: MMC: sdhci@7e300000: 0 >>> console: Loading Environment from FAT... Card did not respond to >>> voltage select! >>> console: In: serial >>> console: Out: vidconsole >>> console: Err: vidconsole >>> console: Net: No ethernet found. >>> console: starting USB... >>> console: USB0: Port not available. >>> console: Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 >>> console: U-Boot> >>> console: U-Boot> bdinfo >>> console: arch_number = 0x00000000 >>> console: boot_params = 0x00000100 >>> console: DRAM bank = 0x00000000 >>> console: -> start = 0x00000000 >>> console: -> size = 0x3c000000 >>> console: baudrate = 115200 bps >>> console: TLB addr = 0x3bff0000 >>> console: relocaddr = 0x3bf64000 >>> console: reloc off = 0x3bf5c000 >>> console: irq_sp = 0x3bb5fec0 >>> console: sp start = 0x3bb5feb0 >>> console: Early malloc usage: 2a4 / 400 >>> console: fdt_blob = 0x3bfbdfb0 >>> console: U-Boot> version >>> console: U-Boot 2019.01+dfsg-7 (May 14 2019 - 02:07:44 +0000) >>> console: gcc (Debian 8.3.0-7) 8.3.0 >>> console: GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1 >>> console: U-Boot> reset >>> console: resetting ... >>> PASS (0.46 s) >>> >>> U-Boot is built by the Debian project, see: >>> https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Allwinner#Creating_a_bootable_SD_Card_with_u-boot >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> >>> --- >>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >>> b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >>> index e40b84651b..682b801b4f 100644 >>> --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >> >> The file is called boot_*linux*_console.py ... so shouldn't tests that >> don't use Linux rather go into another file instead? >> Either machine_arm_raspi.py or maybe a boot_firmware_console.py file? > > Yes I have a series ready splitting boot_linux_console.py per machines > (as suggested machine_arm_raspi.py) not for consistency with fw/linux > but because I'm tired of fixing conflicts while rebasing since months.
Ah, great, good idea. That will also make it easier to assign the files to entries in MAINTAINERS, I guess. Thanks, Thomas
