On 1/27/20 10:48 AM, Michael Rolnik wrote: > Not used. it's there just for clarity. to follow the pattern like PC > > AVR_FEATURE_1_BYTE_PC, > AVR_FEATURE_2_BYTE_PC, > AVR_FEATURE_3_BYTE_PC, > > AVR_FEATURE_1_BYTE_SP, > AVR_FEATURE_2_BYTE_SP, > > To show that there is not 3 byte SP or so. > > Should I remove it?
Just asking, I get confused doing the review. I ratter prefer not to have dead code, but is your call. --joa
