On 28/12/19 11:43, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > Commit 11bc4a13d1f4 ("kvm: convert "-machine kernel_irqchip" to an > accelerator property") moves kernel_irqchip property from "-machine" to > "-accel kvm", but it forgets to set the default value of > kernel_irqchip_allowed and kernel_irqchip_split. > > Also cleaning up the three useless members (kernel_irqchip_allowed, > kernel_irqchip_required, kernel_irqchip_split) in struct MachineState. > > Fixes: 11bc4a13d1f4 ("kvm: convert "-machine kernel_irqchip" to an > accelerator property") > Reported-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Add Reported-by tag; > - Initialize kernel_irqchip_split in init_machine();
Now that I am actually reviewing the patch on something other than a phone, I think this would break "-machine kernel_irqchip=split". I'll test, and squash if it works, something like this: diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c index afbbe0a1af..ea35433170 100644 --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct KVMState int kvm_shadow_mem; bool kernel_irqchip_allowed; bool kernel_irqchip_required; - bool kernel_irqchip_split; + OnOffAuto kernel_irqchip_split; bool sync_mmu; bool manual_dirty_log_protect; /* The man page (and posix) say ioctl numbers are signed int, but @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ static void kvm_irqchip_create(KVMState *s) * in-kernel irqchip for us */ ret = kvm_arch_irqchip_create(s); if (ret == 0) { - if (s->kernel_irqchip_split) { + if (s->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) { perror("Split IRQ chip mode not supported."); exit(1); } else { @@ -2070,7 +2070,9 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) goto err; } - s->kernel_irqchip_split = mc->default_kernel_irqchip_split; + if (s->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) { + s->kernel_irqchip_split = mc->default_kernel_irqchip_split ? ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; + } if (s->kernel_irqchip_allowed) { kvm_irqchip_create(s); @@ -3007,17 +3009,17 @@ static void kvm_set_kernel_irqchip(Object *obj, Visitor *v, case ON_OFF_SPLIT_ON: s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; s->kernel_irqchip_required = true; - s->kernel_irqchip_split = false; + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; break; case ON_OFF_SPLIT_OFF: s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = false; s->kernel_irqchip_required = false; - s->kernel_irqchip_split = false; + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; break; case ON_OFF_SPLIT_SPLIT: s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; s->kernel_irqchip_required = true; - s->kernel_irqchip_split = true; + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_ON; break; default: /* The value was checked in visit_type_OnOffSplit() above. If @@ -3040,7 +3042,7 @@ bool kvm_kernel_irqchip_required(void) bool kvm_kernel_irqchip_split(void) { - return kvm_state->kernel_irqchip_split; + return kvm_state->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON; } static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj) @@ -3049,6 +3051,7 @@ static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj) s->kvm_shadow_mem = -1; s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO; } static void kvm_accel_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) As a follow up, kernel_irqchip_allowed and kernel_irqchip_required could also be changed to a single OnOffAuto field, I think. Paolo