On 25.10.19 12:19, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 25.10.2019 um 11:58 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> We will need this for the next patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/file-posix.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
>> index 695fcf740d..5cd54c8bff 100644
>> --- a/block/file-posix.c
>> +++ b/block/file-posix.c
>> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVRawState {
>> int perm_change_flags;
>> BDRVReopenState *reopen_state;
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFS
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_XFS) || defined(CONFIG_FALLOCATE)
>> bool is_xfs:1;
>> #endif
>> bool has_discard:1;
>> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
>> *options,
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_XFS
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_XFS) || defined(CONFIG_FALLOCATE)
>> if (platform_test_xfs_fd(s->fd)) {
>
> platform_test_xfs_fd() is defined in a header file from xfsprogs. I
> don't think you can call that without CONFIG_XFS, it would break the
> build.Aw. OK. Should we then just assume is_xfs to be true (for the next patch) with !defined(CONFIG_XFS) && defined(CONFIG_FALLOCATE)? Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
