On 16/09/19 04:02, Wei Yang wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:12:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 13/09/19 01:02, Wei Yang wrote: >>> It shows PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL may represents more node the tree could hold. >> >> Which is good, it means the assert can trigger. >> > > Per my understanding, it means the assert can't trigger.
You're right, sorry. That's what I meant. Paolo >>> The assert here is not harmful, while maybe we can have a better way to >>> handle >>> it? >> >> I don't know... The assert just says "careful, someone treats >> PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL specially!". It's documentation too. >> >> Paolo >
