On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:12:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >On 13/09/19 01:02, Wei Yang wrote: >> It shows PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL may represents more node the tree could hold. > >Which is good, it means the assert can trigger. >
Per my understanding, it means the assert can't trigger. >> The assert here is not harmful, while maybe we can have a better way to >> handle >> it? > >I don't know... The assert just says "careful, someone treats >PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL specially!". It's documentation too. > >Paolo -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
