On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:18:26AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Add a runner script to be able to run acceptance tests within
> Docker images. We can now reproduce Travis CI builds locally (and
> debug them!).
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/docker/test-acceptance | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/docker/test-acceptance
>
> diff --git a/tests/docker/test-acceptance b/tests/docker/test-acceptance
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000..84edaa676c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/docker/test-acceptance
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +#!/bin/bash -e
> +#
> +# Compile default Travis-CI target and run Avocado acceptance tests
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat Inc.
> +#
> +# Authors:
> +# Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> +#
> +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2
> +# or (at your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in
> +# the top-level directory.
> +
> +. common.rc
> +
> +cd "$BUILD_DIR"
> +
> +DEF_TARGET_LIST="x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu"
> +TARGET_LIST=${TARGET_LIST:-$DEF_TARGET_LIST} \
> +build_qemu
> +check_qemu check-acceptance
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
I'm currently seeing test errors when running in a container:
MKDIR /tmp/qemu-test/build/tests/results
AVOCADO tests/acceptance
JOB ID : fe56cc0b2d1adbc0b5bb5828902e113d596edccf
JOB LOG :
/tmp/qemu-test/build/tests/results/job-2019-08-19T22.13-fe56cc0/job.log
(01/27)
/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_x86_64_pc:
ERROR: join() argument must be str or bytes, not 'NoneType' (0.05 s)
Interrupting job (failfast).
RESULTS : PASS 0 | ERROR 1 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 26 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 |
CANCEL 0
JOB TIME : 0.26 s
/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/Makefile.include:1158: recipe for target
'check-acceptance' failed
make: *** [check-acceptance] Error 9
That being said, I'm not running it under docker, but under podman,
although I'm not convinced yet that is the defining issue. I'll try
to identify what's going here.
Cheers,
- Cleber.
