On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Here are two small fixes.
> 
> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
> 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too,
>    but it seems to be real bug and fix is very simple, so,
>    may be 4.1 is better
> 
> Or you may take the whole series to 4.1 if you want.
> 

I think (1) and (2) can go in for stable after review, but they're not
crucial for 4.1 especially at this late of a stage. Should be cataclysms
only right now.

--js

Reply via email to