On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi all! > > Here are two small fixes. > > 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2 > 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too, > but it seems to be real bug and fix is very simple, so, > may be 4.1 is better > > Or you may take the whole series to 4.1 if you want. > I think (1) and (2) can go in for stable after review, but they're not crucial for 4.1 especially at this late of a stage. Should be cataclysms only right now. --js
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [P... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [P... Max Reitz
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [P... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block/backu... Max Reitz
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block/backup: deal w... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block/backu... John Snow
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block/b... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] blo... John Snow
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block/b... Max Reitz
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block/backu... Max Reitz
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] backup fixes for... John Snow
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] backup fixe... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] backup ... John Snow
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] backup ... John Snow