On 7/14/19 5:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > I had a look at some of these before, but mostly I came > to the conclusion that it wasn't worth trying to put the > effort into keeping up with the site because they didn't > seem to provide any useful way to mark things as false > positives. Coverity has its flaws but at least you can do > that kind of thing in its UI (it runs at about a 33% fp > rate, I think.)
Yes, LGTM wants you to modify the source code with /* lgtm [cpp/some-warning-code] */ and on the same line as the reported problem. Which is mildly annoying in that you're definitely committing to LGTM in the long term. Also for any non-trivial bit of code, it will almost certainly run over 80 columns. r~
