On 15.07.19 09:22, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12.07.19 09:35, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>> Remove transactional & non transactional device info
>>> for virtio pmem.
>>
>> Can you explain and add *why* ?
>
> As per upstream suggestion by Cornelia & MST, transactional devices are for
> legacy purpose. So, does not make sense for virtio-pmem.
With something like that added to the description
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Pankaj
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagu...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
>>> index 0da6627469..fe2af00fa1 100644
>>> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
>>> @@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ static void virtio_pmem_pci_instance_init(Object *obj)
>>> static const VirtioPCIDeviceTypeInfo virtio_pmem_pci_info = {
>>> .base_name = TYPE_VIRTIO_PMEM_PCI,
>>> .generic_name = "virtio-pmem-pci",
>>> - .transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-transitional",
>>> - .non_transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-non-transitional",
>>> .instance_size = sizeof(VirtIOPMEMPCI),
>>> .instance_init = virtio_pmem_pci_instance_init,
>>> .class_init = virtio_pmem_pci_class_init,
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David / dhildenb
>>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
