>
> On 12.07.19 09:35, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > Remove transactional & non transactional device info
> > for virtio pmem.
>
> Can you explain and add *why* ?
As per upstream suggestion by Cornelia & MST, transactional devices are for
legacy purpose. So, does not make sense for virtio-pmem.
Thanks,
Pankaj
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagu...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
> > index 0da6627469..fe2af00fa1 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c
> > @@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ static void virtio_pmem_pci_instance_init(Object *obj)
> > static const VirtioPCIDeviceTypeInfo virtio_pmem_pci_info = {
> > .base_name = TYPE_VIRTIO_PMEM_PCI,
> > .generic_name = "virtio-pmem-pci",
> > - .transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-transitional",
> > - .non_transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-non-transitional",
> > .instance_size = sizeof(VirtIOPMEMPCI),
> > .instance_init = virtio_pmem_pci_instance_init,
> > .class_init = virtio_pmem_pci_class_init,
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
