On 04/25/2011 08:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/25/2011 12:27 PM, Lluís wrote: >> But in any case, I'm still not sure if stderr should have programatic >> tracing state controls. > > Yes, please, stderr is even more useful than simple when you're using it > under gdb.
Agreed, trace control seems really useful with stderr, and we should be able to do this in a generic way (shared by simple and stderr backends). -- Fabien Chouteau
