On 5/27/19 10:39 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2019 00:07:57 +0900, > Richard Henderson wrote: >> Obviously there are still a few inconsistencies in the >> format strings used for the immediates, but the format >> is readable and it is easy to look at the opcode to see >> how our decode compares to the manual. >> > > Hmm. > The output of the immediate value should be the same as the output of objdump. > I do not think that it is the proper format, but I did that because > it was useful for comparing the results.
This is a fair comment. Of course, we could also simultaneously fix inconsistencies in objdump. I doubt that any of these cases are intentionally different. Something for later, perhaps. r~
