On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > When scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports something like > > John Doe <j...@example.org> (maintainer:Overall) > > the user is left to wonder *which* of our three "Overall" sections > applies. We have three, one each under "Guest CPU cores (TCG)", > "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)", and "Overall usermode emulation". > > Rename sections under > > * "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (TCG)" > > * "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (KVM)" > > * "Guest CPU Cores (Xen)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (Xen)" > > * "Architecture support" from "FOO" to "FOO general architecture > support" > > * "Tiny Code Generator (TCG)" from "FOO target" to "FOO TCG target" > > While there, > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
... > -OpenRISC > +OpenRISC CPU cores (TCG) > M: Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> > S: Odd Fixes > F: target/openrisc/ > F: hw/openrisc/ > F: tests/tcg/openrisc/ > As directories listed there I look over both target/ (TCG?) and hw/. Would it be better to be 'OpenRISC general architecture'? -Stafford
