On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:05:30 +0200
David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 26.04.19 14:01, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26.04.19 13:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 26.04.19 13:36, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 26.04.19 13:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>>> On 26.04.19 13:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>> 8561 and 8562 will be gen15 machines. There is no name yet, lets us use
> >>>>> the cpu id as base name. Later on we can provide aliases with the proper
> >>>>> name.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 ++
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> >>>>> index d683635eb5..dd6415103f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> >>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> >>>>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static S390CPUDef s390_cpu_defs[] = {
> >>>>> CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14", "IBM z14 GA1"),
> >>>>> CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 2, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14.2", "IBM z14
> >>>>> GA2"),
> >>>>> CPUDEF_INIT(0x3907, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14ZR1", "IBM z14
> >>>>> Model ZR1 GA1"),
> >>>>> + CPUDEF_INIT(0x8561, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8561", "IBM 8561
> >>>>> GA1"),
> >>>>> + CPUDEF_INIT(0x8562, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8562", "IBM 8562
> >>>>> GA1"),
> >>>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> Thinking out loud, I know that official names are not published yet.
> >>>> Looking at the recent history (z13, z14), my educated guess would be
> >>>> z15. I guess pretty much everybody would guess that.
> >>>
> >>> Not sure about trademark aspects - especially if this really becomes z15.
> >>> The smaller
> >>> machine has no real history (ZR1 vs. s vs BC). So I think I would rather
> >>> have a correct
> >>> number than a partially correct name.
> >>
> >> We could also use "gen15a" and "gen15b", still better to get than magic
> >> numbers. (yeah well, they are not magic)
> >>
> >> If you want to stick with numbers, be aware that cpu numbers are not
> >> injective, so at some point we will need e.g. "8561.2", just so you're
> >> aware of the implications.
> >
> > I think whatever we have here is only used internally for expansion
> > (host-model)
> > and the user will use later the real name when available. (custom). So
> > probably this
> > does not matter for a long time. But I might be wrong.
> > I tend to prefer gen15 over z15 but 856x has also its charm.
FWIW, I'd prefer gen15 over 856x, but...
> >
>
> Another question would be, can we rename before the next QEMU release,
> so it will never be officially part of QEMU? Then we don't need aliases
> after all. Of course, distros have to take care of that as well, but
> that shouldn't be upstream QEMUs business.
...if we could do that, I'd like that even better.
