On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:31:42 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.y...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:39AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >In case of UEFI, RSDP doesn't have to be located in lowmem,
> >it could be placed at any address. Make sure that test won't
> >break if it is placed above the first 4Gb of address space.
> >
> >PS:
> >While at it cleanup some local variables as we don't really
> >need them.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> >---
> >v2:
> > - s/In case of UEFI/In case of UEFI,/ (Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>)
> >---
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index 2ee044c..c29dcf4 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > typedef struct {
> > const char *machine;
> > const char *variant;
> >- uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint64_t rsdp_addr;
> > uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > GArray *tables;
> > uint32_t smbios_ep_addr;
> >@@ -86,13 +86,11 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> >
> > static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >- uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;
> >- uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
> >
> >- acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, addr, rsdp_table);
> >- revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >+ acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, data->rsdp_addr, rsdp_table);
>
> Ok, I think this is the reason you change the second parameter from uint32_t
> to uint64_t in 1st patch.
>
> Maybe we need to move that on to this one?
Sure.
There is one additional path to make 64-bit table pointers support a bit more
complete.
I'll respin series once travis build passes.
> >
> >- switch (revision) {
> >+ switch (rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]) {
> > case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> > g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> >--
> >2.7.4
>
