On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:07:51AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800
>Wei Yang <richardw.y...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> >If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT
>> >and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise.
>> >
>> >While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address().
>>
>> Would it be proper to split this into another patch?
>
>it should be fine to remove code that's being replaced by new one
>which substitutes the former within the same patch.
>but if you insist I can split it into another patch.
I am fine with this included.
>
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>> >---
>> >PS:
>> > it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0
>> > but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt
>> > board which uses provides XSDT table.
>> >---
>> > tests/acpi-utils.h | 3 +--
>> > tests/acpi-utils.c | 14 +-------------
>> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>> >index ef388bb..8c68201 100644
>> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
>> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>> >@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct {
>> >
>> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
>> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
>> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
>> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t
>> >*rsdp_table);
>> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t
>> >*rsdp_table);
>>
>> Would you mind giving some hint of this change?
>thanks for spotting it. IT certainly doesn't belong to this patch.
>I'll need to recheck if supporting 64bit address fields is done properly
>and find another place where to move this hunk.
>
>>
>> > void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len,
>> > const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig,
>> > bool verify_checksum);
>> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>> >index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644
>> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
>> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>> >@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts)
>> > return off;
>> > }
>> >
>> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
>> >-{
>> >- uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
>> >- uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
>> >-
>> >- /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
>> >- g_assert(revision == 2);
>> >-
>> >- memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset
>> >*/], 8);
>> >- return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
>> >-}
>> >-
>> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t
>> >*rsdp_table)
>> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t
>> >*rsdp_table)
>> > {
>> > uint8_t revision;
>> >
>> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>> >index a506dcb..24bd102 100644
>> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>> >@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> >-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
>> >+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data)
>> > {
>> >+ const char *sig = "RSDT";
>> > AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {};
>> >+ int entry_size = 4;
>> >+ int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */;
>> > uint8_t *ent;
>> >
>> >- /* read RSDT table */
>> >+ if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) {
>> >+ addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */;
>> >+ entry_size = 8;
>> >+ sig = "XSDT";
>> >+ }
>> >+ /* read [RX]SDT table */
>> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len,
>> >- &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT",
>> >true);
>> >+ &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true);
>> >
>> > /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced
>> > tables */
>> >- ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size
>> >*/) {
>> >+ ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) {
>> > AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {};
>> >
>> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len,
>> > ent,
>> >@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data
>> >*data)
>> > data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
>> > test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
>> > test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
>> >- test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
>> >+ test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
>> > test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
>> >
>> > if (iasl) {
>> >--
>> >2.7.4
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
