On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:30:01AM -0400, Catherine Ho wrote:
> Commit 18269069c310 ("migration: Introduce ignore-shared capability")
> addes ignore-shared capability to bypass the shared ramblock (e,g,
> membackend + numa node). It does good to live migration.
>
> This commit expectes that QEMU doesn't write to guest RAM until
> VM starts, but it does on aarch64 qemu:
> Backtrace:
> 1 0x000055f4a296dd84 in address_space_write_rom_internal () at exec.c:3458
> 2 0x000055f4a296de3a in address_space_write_rom () at exec.c:3479
> 3 0x000055f4a2d519ff in rom_reset () at hw/core/loader.c:1101
> 4 0x000055f4a2d475ec in qemu_devices_reset () at hw/core/reset.c:69
> 5 0x000055f4a2c90a28 in qemu_system_reset () at vl.c:1675
> 6 0x000055f4a2c9851d in main () at vl.c:4552
>
> Actually, on arm64 virt marchine, ramblock "dtb" will be filled into ram
> during rom_reset. In ignore-shared incoming case, this rom filling
> is not required since all the data has been stored in memory backend file.
>
> Fixes: commit 18269069c310 ("migration: Introduce ignore-shared capability")
> Signed-off-by: Catherine Ho <catherine.h...@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Yury Kotov <yury-ko...@yandex-team.ru>
(note: IIUC normally you should have your signed-off to be the last
line before the suggested-by :)
About the patch content, I have had a question on whether we should
need to check ignore-shared at all... That question lies in:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10859889/#22546487
And if my understanding was correct above, IMHO the patch could be as
simply be as "if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) return;" at [1]
below.
Thanks,
> ---
> hw/core/loader.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/exec/cpu-common.h | 1 +
> migration/ram.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
> index fe5cb24122..861a03335b 100644
> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h"
> #include "exec/memory.h"
> #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> +#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> #include "hw/boards.h"
> #include "qemu/cutils.h"
>
> @@ -1086,6 +1087,9 @@ int rom_add_option(const char *file, int32_t bootindex)
> static void rom_reset(void *unused)
> {
> Rom *rom;
> + MemoryRegion *mr;
> + hwaddr hw_addr;
> + hwaddr l;
[1]
>
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(rom, &roms, next) {
> if (rom->fw_file) {
> @@ -1094,6 +1098,17 @@ static void rom_reset(void *unused)
> if (rom->data == NULL) {
> continue;
> }
> +
> + /* bypass the rom blob in ignore-shared migration case*/
> + if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + mr = address_space_translate(rom->as, rom->addr, &hw_addr, &l,
> + true, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (mr->ram_block != NULL && ramblock_is_ignored(mr->ram_block))
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> if (rom->mr) {
> void *host = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(rom->mr);
> memcpy(host, rom->data, rom->datasize);
> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> index cef8b88a2a..c80b7248a6 100644
> --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb);
> ram_addr_t qemu_ram_get_offset(RAMBlock *rb);
> ram_addr_t qemu_ram_get_used_length(RAMBlock *rb);
> bool qemu_ram_is_shared(RAMBlock *rb);
> +bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block);
> bool qemu_ram_is_uf_zeroable(RAMBlock *rb);
> void qemu_ram_set_uf_zeroable(RAMBlock *rb);
> bool qemu_ram_is_migratable(RAMBlock *rb);
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 35bd6213e9..d6de9d335d 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block)
> +bool ramblock_is_ignored(RAMBlock *block)
> {
> return !qemu_ram_is_migratable(block) ||
> (migrate_ignore_shared() && qemu_ram_is_shared(block));
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
