On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > + } > > Did I miss some change in the plan? I thought we were heading for a > generic, reusable driftfix tool box (or periodic timer service)? Or is > this intentionally an intermediate step?
Which is a medium to long way in the future. There is benefit of having this early, since it can deliver real functionality - a reliable hpet, and converting to whatever the api may look like in the future.
