Am 21.03.2019 um 15:23 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: > On Thu 21 Mar 2019 09:30:26 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > 20.03.2019 20:25, Alberto Garcia wrote: > >> On Wed 20 Mar 2019 10:35:27 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > >>>> Maybe at least this kind of freezing isn't the right tool for block > >>>> jobs, after all. > >>> > >>> I think, the correct way, which will support these correct cases > >>> (which however don't look like real use cases) is removing base from > >>> stream view. Stream should operate instead using bottom-node. > >> > >> What is bottom-node? > > > > I mean bottom intermediate node, or a node which backing is base. > > But the base node is needed, because even if the job doesn't operate > directly on it it does use the name of the image to store on the top > image's backing file string.
That's a one-time thing at the end of the operation, though. I don't think there is a problem with replacing the base node while the job is running. It just needs to look at backing_bs(base_node) when it rewrites the backing file string. Kevin
