20.03.2019 20:25, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed 20 Mar 2019 10:35:27 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >>> Maybe at least this kind of freezing isn't the right tool for block >>> jobs, after all. >> >> I think, the correct way, which will support these correct cases >> (which however don't look like real use cases) is removing base from >> stream view. Stream should operate instead using bottom-node. > > What is bottom-node?
I mean bottom intermediate node, or a node which backing is base. > >> And this all looks really more complicated than what we already have >> with frozen backing chain. >> >> Do we really need such cases with parallel streams, sharing same node >> as base for one and top for another? Will someone be upset if we drop >> usage for such scenarios? > > That would mean that 'base' is blocked and therefore cannot be used by a > different block job. > > I don't think it's terrible to restrict that scenario, although it's > technically a regression so someone could complain about it. As I said > ealier I would prefer not to do it if there's a simple solution (we > would need to think about it), but I wouldn't want to make the code more > complicated just for this use case. > > Berto > -- Best regards, Vladimir
