On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:36:05 PDT (-0700), arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Machines with no maintainer, but at least one supporter:
[...]
    = hw/riscv/sifive_e.c =
    Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Sagar Karandikar <sag...@eecs.berkeley.edu> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Bastian Koppelmann <kbast...@mail.uni-paderborn.de> (supporter:RISC-V)
    qemu-ri...@nongnu.org (open list:RISC-V)

    = hw/riscv/sifive_u.c =
    Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Sagar Karandikar <sag...@eecs.berkeley.edu> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Bastian Koppelmann <kbast...@mail.uni-paderborn.de> (supporter:RISC-V)
    qemu-ri...@nongnu.org (open list:RISC-V)

    = hw/riscv/spike.c =
    Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Sagar Karandikar <sag...@eecs.berkeley.edu> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Bastian Koppelmann <kbast...@mail.uni-paderborn.de> (supporter:RISC-V)
    qemu-ri...@nongnu.org (open list:RISC-V)

    = hw/riscv/virt.c =
    Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Sagar Karandikar <sag...@eecs.berkeley.edu> (supporter:RISC-V)
    Bastian Koppelmann <kbast...@mail.uni-paderborn.de> (supporter:RISC-V)
    qemu-ri...@nongnu.org (open list:RISC-V)

Is "maintainer" a higher level of support than "supporter"? If that's the case then I'm happy signing up to be a maintainer of these, as part of by job at SiFive is to make sure these work. Sorry, I'm not entirely sure how this all works -- from reading the top of the MAINTAINERS file it appears that "supported" is a higher level of support than "maintained".

Reply via email to