On 05.04.2011, at 07:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>>>> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int vscsi_srp_direct_data(VSCSIState *s,
>> vscsi_req *req,
>>>> {
>>>> struct srp_direct_buf *md = req->cur_desc;
>>>> uint32_t llen;
>>>> - int rc;
>>>> + int rc = 0;
>>>
>>> David, is this correct? Or would rc be -1 when !llen?
>>
>> I talked to Ben, who wrote this code - apparently his mail server blew
>> up. This patch should be correct, AFAWCT. It's not totally clear
>> what the right return value should be in thie case, or indeed that
>> this case ever actually happens, but we think 0 is right.
>
> Just double checked and we never call that function if len is 0
That's probably the reason gcc didn't complain before. So I'll just take
Stefan's patch.
Alex
