On 2/6/19 12:26 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

>>> shows a lot of, exactly 34 after io.c already updated.
>>> They are in different subsystems, so I think it should be simpler to push 
>>> this
>>> one as a precedent and example, and then send separate patches (or series)
>>> per-maintainer.
>>
>> Most are block related, so getting it in through the block maintainers
>> is probably the easiest - but you ARE right that one patch per one or
>> two files or two is going to be smartest (otherwise, it gets too big).
>>

>> I'd group qed-table.c and qed.c; and the two hw/ide/ files; resulting in
>> 14 more patches to go.
>>
> 
> So, you, think better is to make one common patch set? Ok, I'll do (hmm or 
> start doing)
> it tomorrow as v3 if no other opinions.

Yes, a v3 series of 16 patches for the entire conversion, and cc:
qemu-block, should be sufficient.  Looking forward to seeing v3.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to