On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:18:36PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Use pvh.bin option rom when we are booting an uncompressed > kernel using the x86/HVM direct boot ABI. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> > Based-on: <1545422632-24444-5-git-send-email-liam.merw...@oracle.com> > --- > hw/i386/pc.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c > index 06bce6a101..deab8a2816 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c > @@ -1005,6 +1005,10 @@ static void load_linux(PCMachineState *pcms, > fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_SETUP_DATA, > header, sizeof(header)); > > + option_rom[nb_option_roms].bootindex = 0; > + option_rom[nb_option_roms].name = "pvh.bin"; > + nb_option_roms++; > +
xen_load_linux() has the following:
assert(!strcmp(option_rom[i].name, "linuxboot.bin") ||
!strcmp(option_rom[i].name, "linuxboot_dma.bin") ||
!strcmp(option_rom[i].name, "multiboot.bin"));
I wonder if it needs to be updated for pvh.bin?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
